Reporting Analyses of Covariance Structures
نویسنده
چکیده
This contribution is focused on how to write a research paper when structural equation models are being used in empirical work. The main question to be answered is what information should be reported and what results can be deleted without much loss of judgment about the quality of research and the validity of conclusions being made. The major conjecture is that all information should be reported, or referred to, that enables each member of the scientific community, at least in principle, to replicate the analysis as it is published. The recommendations are ordered in the framework of the empirical research cycle. They are meant for authors, in particular students employing structural equation models for their dissertation, as well as for editors and reviewers.
منابع مشابه
Modelling of Correlated Ordinal Responses, by Using Multivariate Skew Probit with Different Types of Variance Covariance Structures
In this paper, a multivariate fundamental skew probit (MFSP) model is used to model correlated ordinal responses which are constructed from the multivariate fundamental skew normal (MFSN) distribution originate to the greater flexibility of MFSN. To achieve an appropriate VC structure for reaching reliable statistical inferences, many types of variance covariance (VC) structures are considered ...
متن کاملCovariance Structures for Quantitative Genetic Analyses
INTRODUCTION Covariance matrices in quantitative genetic analyses have, by and large, been considered ‘unstructured’, i.e. for q random variables, there are q(q + 1)/2 distinct covariance components. This implies that the number of parameters to be estimated increases quadratically with the number of variables. Multivariate analyses involving more than a few traits have been hampered by computa...
متن کاملA PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of...
متن کاملپریزما؛ موارد ترجیحی در گزارش مقالات مروری منظم و فراتحلیل
Today, understanding of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their practical use is essential for who concerned with society's health. Most of the medical reports invoked to these reviews and statements and it is necessary for scientific experts to be familiar with their performing rules and the way of their writing. The basic sciences specialists and clinical professionals study them to ...
متن کاملTesting for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement In variance
Addresses issues related to partial measurement in variance using a tutorial approach based on the LISREL confirmatory factor analytic model. Specifically, we demonstrate procedures for (a) using "sensitivity analyses" to establish stable and substantively well-fitting baseline models, (b) determining partially invariant measurement parameters, and (c) testing for the invariance of factor covar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000